When Suarez International began the study of the Red Dot Pistol in 2009 I had no idea that it would become such a popular and mainstream idea. And yet today, almost a decade later, we are seeing more pistols with red dots than pistols without them. I predict that it will be a rare thing to see a pistol in a combatant’s holster that does not have a red dot as a sighting system.
However what invariably happens is a desire to shortcut the system, and to get the benefits on the cheap. With that we see the proliferation of low quality red dot sights mounted on pistols. And by “low quality” I mean sights whose greatest attribute is that they are cheap. But “cheap” never brings quality.
Now I understand very well that not everybody can drop $500 on an optic but an optic on a handgun that will be carried 24-7 in a holster is vastly different than an optic on a rifle that will sit in the safe until the weekend. Weapons meant for fighting (or “self-defense” if you need to be careful with your thoughts) require certain attributes. Professionals, or those following similar standards, cannot afford an optic to fail.
Look if you are a sportsman or a hobbyist and you never intend to carry that Red Dot Pistol concealed, in a holster, in the real world, in anticipation of a gunfight, then read no further because I have nothing of value to offer you.
On the other hand if you carry your Red Dot Pistol daily, then you like the professional, cannot accept failure of any kind.
Your installation of the chosen red dot on your pistol will follow a certain pattern. And the red dot that you choose must have certain attributes. And there is a price for those attributes. As of December 2016, the optics that I would suggest as “suitable for a carry handgun” are as follows.
1). The Trijicon RMR in its various permutations.
2). The Leupold DeltaPoint Pro. I suggest a 2.5 MOA Dot and not the7.5 MOA Triangle. Battery life is nowhere near as long as an RMR so be ready to change batteries far more frequently.
3). The Shield RMS from the United Kingdom. We are direct dealers with the manufacturer, and import them.. They are quite suitable for some narrower slide handguns such as the SIG P-226 and the Glock 43. They are not quite as robust or rugged as an RMR or a DP Pro but they are quite suitable for CCW carry. They are not waterproof so I would not use them for a hard duty weapon.
4). The Vortex Razor. This is a relatively new optic but it is high-profile - as high-profile as the DeltaPoint Pro, and it requires taller sights than usual. In our testing it has proven quite robust and suitable for handgun.
We get inquiries about other red dot sights and I advise the customer that we won’t work with them for the simple reason that they will not work well on a combat handgun and I will not put our name to such an installation.
Things that would disqualify a red dot sight for combat handgun usage.
1). Cheap. Look…everything has a price and a cost. There is no bargain eye surgery, or cheap college education. We know the cost of manufacturing a great and robust red dot sight. And if we see a sight being sold for extremely lower price points than the top units on the market, rest assured that somebody cut corners in manufacturing, components, or assembly.
A $200 Burris Fastfire may be all the rage at the bullet golfer’s convention, but trust me…there is a reason why it is only $200.
2). External, and easily activated, “on-off” buttons placed where they will be activated by holster use. The Leupold DP Pro and the Vortex razor have the buttons inside the red dot unit itself. The Trijicon RM06 and RM07 have them set up so that they must activated in unison and with a direct pressure that is unlikely in holster use.
The Fastfire (again) and the SIG Romeo are unsuitable for serious handgun use for that very reason.
3). Waterproof, Impact Proof, and General Ruggedness. If an optic is not waterproof, I would disqualify it from any sort of serious usage. The Shield is a grey area as it is the only smaller sized red dot that I would consider for use on Glock 43s...but not on a full use duty weapon. If it breaks easily, or stops working due to an inadvertent impact, I would disqualify it from use.
4). Ability to install with Back Up Cowitness Sights. I am astounded that some people still want to argue the point about this. The taller the Red Dot sits, the taller the cowitness sights that will be necessary. That has been the main complaint with buyers of the Glock MOS system. The cowitness sights need to be so tall that holster selection becomes a potential problem as well as lateral pressure on the front sight possibly damaging it.
Some optics do not lend themselves to use with properly installed cowitness sights. The Insights MRDS for example has an “On-Off” button that would interfere with those sights, as well as being quite tall in its design.
If you are considering advancing your skillsets and equipment to the Red Dot Pistol, take considerable time to research your choices. The bargain of the century may not be what you think, nor work as well as advertised. There is a price for quality, and there are no shortcuts to it. As the old TV ad noted, “You can pay now…or you can pay twice as much later”.